Skills
brainstorming
brainstorming
npx @loomcraft/cli add skill brainstormingFrontmatter
Name
brainstorming
Description
Socratic questioning, assumption identification, and brief refinement. Use when starting a new feature, exploring requirements, or refining a project brief.
Content
# Brainstorming ## Critical Rules - **Never jump to solutions** — explore the problem space first. - **Socratic questioning** — ask "why" at least 3 times before proposing anything. - **Surface hidden assumptions** — make implicit constraints explicit. - **Diverge then converge** — generate options broadly, then narrow down. - **Document everything** — capture decisions, rejected alternatives, and rationale. ## Socratic Questioning Framework Use progressive questioning to refine requirements: ### Level 1 — Clarify the Goal - What problem are we solving? - Who is the primary user? - What does success look like? - What is the deadline or timeline constraint? ### Level 2 — Challenge Assumptions - Why do we believe this is the right approach? - What are we assuming about the user's behavior? - What happens if our assumption is wrong? - Is there existing data to validate this? ### Level 3 — Explore Alternatives - What other solutions could achieve the same goal? - What is the simplest version of this feature? - What would we build if we had half the time? - What would a competitor do differently? ### Level 4 — Define Boundaries - What is explicitly out of scope? - What are the non-negotiable requirements? - What are the technical constraints? - What are the dependencies on other teams or systems? ## Brief Template After questioning, produce a structured brief: ```markdown ## Feature Brief: [Feature Name] ### Problem Statement [1-2 sentences describing the user problem] ### Target User [Who benefits from this feature] ### Success Criteria - [ ] [Measurable outcome 1] - [ ] [Measurable outcome 2] ### Proposed Solution [High-level description of the approach] ### Assumptions - [Assumption 1] — validated / to validate - [Assumption 2] — validated / to validate ### Out of Scope - [What we explicitly won't do] ### Open Questions - [Unresolved question 1] - [Unresolved question 2] ### Rejected Alternatives - [Alternative 1]: rejected because [reason] ``` ## Do - Start every feature discussion with "What problem are we solving?" - List at least 2 alternative approaches before choosing one - Capture the "why" behind every decision for future reference - Involve different perspectives (user, developer, business) - Time-box brainstorming sessions (15-30 min max) ## Don't - Don't start coding before the brief is validated - Don't dismiss ideas during divergent thinking - Don't let one voice dominate the discussion - Don't skip the "out of scope" section — it prevents scope creep - Don't confuse brainstorming with planning — stay at the "what" level, not "how" ## Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Problem | Fix | |-------------|---------|-----| | **Solution-first** | Jumping to implementation before understanding the problem | Start with problem statement, ask "why" 3 times | | **Scope creep** | Adding requirements during brainstorming | Separate "must have" from "nice to have" immediately | | **Analysis paralysis** | Exploring forever without deciding | Time-box and force a decision at the end | | **Groupthink** | Everyone agrees too quickly | Assign a devil's advocate role | | **Vague brief** | Brief without measurable success criteria | Every brief needs at least 2 testable success criteria |
Files
No additional files